BDO's Legal Tech TalkData-Driven Decisions in Legal Tech: The Power of KPIs
About this episode
Recorded live at CLOC in Las Vegas, Daniel Gold and Eric Derk talk with Mori Kabiri, CEO of InfiniGlobe and author of Legal Operations KPIs. Mori explains why analytics should start from the question you want answered, how data quality affects billing codes and narratives, how KPIs relate to OKRs and company strategy, and the most common mistakes in legal KPI programs.
Key takeaways
- Start analytics with the objective. Asking the business question up front leads to better coding and better data.
- Do not let data quality perfectionism eat the budget. Use drop-downs and codes wherever possible.
- KPIs sit at the bottom of a chain that runs from vision and mission to objectives and critical success factors.
- Mori's driving metaphor: the OKR is the destination, speed is a KPI, and miles per gallon is a metric you check less often.
- Retire KPIs that no longer matter. Mori calls it a KPI graveyard, and reports no one misses are a sign it is time.
Full transcript
Transcript from BDO's published episode, edited for transcription errors. Speaker labels added by Gold Standard Leadership.
Welcome to BDO's Legal Tech Talk podcast.
We're joined by judges and legal professionals to discuss emerging trends, regulatory updates, and the latest headlines.
We'll provide tips to help your law firms and legal departments make the most out of legal technology.
Hi, everyone. I'm Jared Crafton, BDO's forensic technology practice leader.
And I'm Daniel Gold, forensics principal and leader of the eDiscovery managed services practice. Let's get started with this episode's exciting topic.
And welcome back to another BDO Legal Tech Talk podcast. And again, we are live from the CLOC conference in Las Vegas and Eric, once again, I feel like we are able to bring together some of the brightest minds in the legal operation space. And I think that we're going to geek out a little bit on this one, Eric. A little bit. We are joined to my right, Mori Kabiri. Mori is the CEO of InfiniGlobe.
He's an author of a book called Legal Operations KPIs, the Professional Handbook to Operational Excellence. I did a little bit of a fanboy crush and admitted that I have a copy of your book and it's actually sitting on my desk back in my home office. And for those that don't know, the legal operations KPI book is a comprehensive guide on transforming legal operations departments through data analytics.
And so that's really where I want to start. So first of all, Mori, welcome to the show. Thank you so much for joining us.
Oh, thank you. I'm glad to be here.
Talk to me a little bit about your background because when I think of KPIs and we interviewed another legal operations professional here as well, and she is very much into KPIs at her organization. I did not ask if she leveraged your book. But one of the things that is interesting is, is that somebody who in companies who leverage KPIs, they're very strategic in nature. In other words, they are thoughtful. In other words, they have thought through what is going to make them successful and they want data to be able to help measure their performance.
And people who do that right, I think, and you're gonna be the one to correct me. I think people that do that correctly are probably the most successful. Whether it be a team, whether it be an organization, they're usually gonna be the most successful. What is your background in data analytics? What is it about KPIs that drew you to it and wanting to write a book about this? That's always a compound question. And I know a judge would tell me to break that one apart, but there you are, Mori.
Thanks, Daniel. Oh, well, my background is in software engineering.
And then when I got into the software back in late nineties, the beginning of the dot com, of course, we were seeing that a lot of data being collected as software tools and all that. And I got involved in a project on doing the research on fuzzy logic. It's kinda like a subject back in the old days, and that was my introduction to data. And when I joined the legal industry early two thousand, building matter management softwares, that was the early time that the data sheet and the basically, the time sheets that I supposed to be the sheet paper was converting into electronic billing, collecting a lot of data, and then happened to be building softwares for the matter management systems.
And the first thing that come up, okay, we collect all this data. Now what? Of course, we do the analysis on the, you know, billing rules and check the codes and rates and all that stuff. But there's a ton of information in those UTPMS codes and the data that you collect. And that was the reason I got really fascinated with what you can do. At the same time, I joined the KPI Institute back in two thousand three, and I saw that metrics and KPI is being used across all industries.
And in the legal sector of the KPI Institute, there was, like, a section for KPIs with, like, five four metrics.
And so that was a time that I start getting involved with building dashboards and all that for the corporate legal departments and office of general counsels and bump bump into those cases where you create something and you see blank faces and not excitement, but you're excited and see the disconnect.
And that was the reason I got more and more, curious as to how this disconnect exists in the legal industry where we don't have it in the other industries.
Yeah. It's really such a cool background.
One of the things that I think we struggle with is so we have the codes.
I remember, I think they started around for litigation codes. Right? They were very specific to practice areas, and now they've expanded. But we also have this other thing, narrative.
And machine learning with narratives has really struggled, I think, within kind of the legal billing process. There's so much richness in the narratives if you have the timekeepers actually enter the narrative properly.
But what are you seeing around the use of narratives in conjunction with the codes that are being entered? Because I think that's the bridge that good analysis can bring forward. Now the narratives might be poorly written as quality issue. But what are you seeing around kind of unifying narratives versus, you know, coded entries?
That's a good question. I think that one of the disconnect I noticed that was we started normally with the data because that's easy. We collect it, and then we figure out what to do with it. But if you start from the end question and see what is it that we're trying to accomplish or what is it like the objective for the analyzing this data.
Let's say if you wanna do cost saving, are you planning to do shift work from some, let's say, partner job to the associate and things like that, then you see that then the value of those codes become meaningful. And then you start saying, okay. So these codes can mean something for me, phase of the, let's say, litigation case. Right?
But if you don't ask question and do the analytics, then the people that they enter the code, if they are not being asked, they are not entering it correctly. And this is like the human behavior.
So by putting those questions on upfront and creating the analytics, then you see anomalies in the code. And, actually, we did a paper on this. Then using those anomaly, you can figure out how to have the better coding. Now you ask about narratives.
If you look at an invoice and you see, let's say, three pages of narratives and you see the code, the first thing you don't look at the code, you look at narratives. So let's say twenty years ago, we didn't have machine learning and AI with the power of now. Right? Now what have the benefit is using the AI to read the narratives and match the code, make sure the codes are correct.
And if the codes are correct, then we can do the analytics on the code. So it definitely there's a lot of tools available out there that they do this, but absolutely, narratives plays a, a key role here. And also the other way around this exists. Right?
If you have a descriptive code, but narrative is very, like, one word or, like, very simple with a number of hours, let's say, four hours unlike research, you can do the reverse. We need more information about these four hours. What did you do and all that stuff?
It's really fascinating. It's been a career of thinking through this very specific problem. Let me ask another question for you because I'd love to get your thoughts. So when we set up a matter management system or e billing system, like we were talking about law manager the other day, we don't always kind of know the end goal.
Like, what are the answers that we're trying to provide? A lot of times we say, well, it's just a place to catalog and understand how to track matters and maybe resources and integration with the docket. Okay. That's great.
But as you evolve some of these technology platforms, the change process of using data in different ways and creating different modules to service a specific need, well, that changes. So considering the massive complexity that many of these matter management systems come with, and when you're trying to maybe service ten, fifteen different practice areas, sometimes globally, how do you think about data quality? Because I've always found that the problem with matter management system isn't features and functionalities, it goes into it. It's data quality.
And if you have bad data quality or you change the schematics on data over time, you're really kind of losing the ability to answer those initial questions, and they certainly are not gonna answer the questions in the future. So how do you think about change management with respect to data quality?
Well, definitely, data quality plays a really key role in doing the analytics and also the KPI and decision making process. If you don't have a good data, decisions are not definitely, valuable as much. But at the same time, I wanna mention that a lot of people, they're getting to data quality. They wanna make sure the data is hundred percent correct. Right? And something in KPIs we do it is just the benefit that you get from a metric compared to the cost of producing the metric.
Right? So let's say if you're collecting data and there is a percentage of, like, mistakes in the data, and in order to fix that and bring it from eighty percent to ninety five percent, you have to be spent, let's say for the sake of argument, dollars ten thousand. Right? And then as a result, you create a metrics that is gonna give you maybe a thousand dollars benefit on decision making. It's not worth it to spend that much time on data quality. Now I don't wanna dismiss your question about data quality. I just wanna mention this because sometimes we get into the data cleanup so much that we lose focus on the actual what matters.
And I've seen this so many times that I'm gonna get back to I'm gonna open a tangent here, but I have seen so many times that we get so focused on make it like a perfect to the penny. Yeah. And we create a report and show it to the upper management. And they say, well, that's not important that much to us. Even the CFO say it's okay to have, like, one or two percent stakes. Right?
But we have other issues that we need to focus. Now data quality, I think one of the key things that I think is very important, again, going back to start from the end and then backtrack and see what are the fields and what are the informations important to you and make sure there are best practices for those. Let's say, do not give them a text field for data entry. Make sure it's a drop down.
Use code as much as possible and things like that. But data quality is one of the area that we're getting more promises on using AI to clean the data, which is something in the past it was very difficult to do. There are more and more data mining tools and data warehouse tools available that can actually automatically, let's say, if you were to enter Los Angeles and it's mistaken a spelling, automatically AI can understand the location even of the data fields.
Mori, you're you're touching on some of the themes that you obviously wrote about in your book, and I think that we were distill it down.
There's four main themes from your book. There's strategic alignment, creating comprehensive KPI frameworks, data driven decision making, and operational excellence.
From this conversation, Eric's question that he asked, and listening to your answer, it makes me want to go back to the very first theme, which is strategic alignment. And you discuss transforming legal departments into strategic business units.
What would you say are the first steps for a legal team that they should take to initiate this transformation? Because everything that you guys just talked about can't happen until we get to a point at a higher level where we're talking about treating this as a true strategic business unit. So what are some of those first steps?
Absolutely. I think that was one of the things that I would say is one of the hardest thing to do, but it's been tested in other industries. Let's say one of the method I'm gonna mention is like balance and scorecard from Kaplan. So starting from region and mission and objective, and then go to the initiatives, and then go to the, basically, mission basically, creating the critical success factors, and then to the KPI.
So you go and start and say, what is it important to our organization?
What are the initiatives that we are taking this year? Let's say, if you wanted to expand to Latin America. Right? The merger acquisition is the goal.
Right? That drives some of the initiatives for all of the practice areas within the legal department to align the metrics that they wanted to track toward that goal. Right? One of the things that a lot of time happens is a cycle of these implementations.
Sometimes we're sure some some companies, especially nowadays, right, the strategy and the alignment changes maybe in a few months.
So we can't have a silo of the business intelligence and KPI created from two years ago and deliver it now, and then the executives are gonna say, this is not our priority right now. So that's definitely one of the area alignments of the metrics and KPI.
I have a concept of, like, KPI graveyard. It's okay to retire some of these KPIs and just put it in a graveyard. Maybe later you can use them, but you need to shift it and always look at what it is important right now.
Legal teams are struggling to manage resources, maintain compliance, and adopt new technologies.
BDO's legal operations team can help.
We enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and support compliance so you can run your legal department like a business. Schedule a meeting with us today at bdo.com.
You said something interesting before, which is about this alignment and that KPIs are really at the bottom.
I think that there's a lot of dismissiveness sometimes towards really appreciating the true value, monetary and otherwise about having a company's core purpose and core values and not just being this thing that is, you know, a marketing slogan. And what I'm hearing you saying, correct me if I'm wrong, is that that's real. If you wanna do things right and make data driven decisions, whatever your core purpose is, your core mission, that has to be real. In order for us to be able to figure out great, our core purpose is this, and now every other business unit, including legal, should then align back up to whatever the CEO says, here's what the company's core purpose, core vision is. And then, great, now we can figure out, okay, great, what are those key performance indicators?
And what are the initiatives, the day to day that we have to do in order to get to that level? Is that right?
That is correct. One of the things that make a slightly different between the legal industry versus, let's say, transportation and aviation is the urgency and the real timeliness of the activities. Right? Let's say if you're in aviation, you have a set of KPIs working for some of them for, like, decades.
Right? That delay in the flights and all that. So immediately, you have to adjust things to make sure that customer satisfactions and all that being taken care of. In the legal, the KPIs may if it's a lag of one month or two months, it's okay.
It's not like real time. But still, we have to make sure that we stay aligned with the c level and actually with the general counsel. But general counsel makes sure that when they go to the board, ask these questions. What is it like the important of our business?
And, of course, CFO is always gonna ask for cost saving. Right? But maybe, you know, as I mentioned about measure acquisition, the CEO may wanna have a different agenda.
Yeah. You know, you talk about vision, mission, and objectives, vision, mission, goals. And then below that is means to measure the effectiveness of the vision, mission, and goals. I think many humans take vision, mission, and goals kind of for granted.
And to be simple, I work for a burger joint. Like, I work for a fast food restaurant. So the vision is maybe we make food, and it's all implicit. Right?
Everybody kind of thinks that it's well, it's obvious. But, actually, if you go a little bit deeper and you think about what you're gonna try to measure against vision, mission, goals, it becomes more of a culture. The vision, mission, goals is not just that we make burgers, but we make the best burgers in this context to service this type of clientele. So you build upon the VMG, but you can't get people to row in the same direction unless you show value, and metrics kind of help with that.
Mhmm. So talk to us about how you have seen companies take these metrics and influence the VMG. Because that's I think a lot of times, the way that you and I are thinking about it is aligned. Like, we start with the objective, the end insight.
People don't always think about that. People think about, well, we just wanna create some measurements and see how we're doing. But if you have a vision, you can design those metrics accordingly. So how have you seen companies use the KPI framework to help the overall betterment of the company?
That's a very good question. And, honestly, I haven't seen many of them done in the corporate legal departments to that degree. It's pieces of this, but one of the thing I've seen culture wise, yes. First of all, one of the thing is very important is get the leadership buy in and get them involved in this process.
So it's not just they come in and just say that, hey. This is important. We just need to get them involved and even the to the process of defining the metrics and KPIs and all that. That's very important because if the leadership is involved, and I'm talking about, let's say, the CLO or general counsel, then the managing counsel in different department, they are involved.
And it's getting something it's part of their basically goal that, hey. In our department, this is what we're gonna do. Let's say, if we wanna increase the customer satisfactions in an insurance company, for instance. Right?
That is not just, like, one department that they are managing one. It's a holistic area. But defining the metrics for each of the department, that's the kind of, like, a part of the KPI program team that they sit down and look at the success factor and translate the success factor based on the smart rules, specifically what it is that the activities you're doing is gonna contribute to the success factor. And as a group, all these success factors, operational success factors are gonna contribute to the mission and vision.
So I think it's just a it's a group activity of all of those. But tactically, in some areas can be done. Let's say, if the goal is to do the saving or maybe reduce the that's something very common. Right?
For instance, the OKR is another term that is here is very useful. So OKR is defining that we're gonna reduce the cost by twenty percent. Right. But that OKR by itself has multiple KPI in it or multiple metrics in it.
So that's another thing that there's a lot we can talk about it, but some people, they get to the focus of, oh, okay, that means that we need to cut the cost by twenty percent no matter what. That means if I have a panel firm, critical firm, and they are doing a great job and they are very critical for us, they have to go twenty percent down. Right? Which is not the case because in some cases, their reputation and the risk is another area that we have to protect the company, not just by cutting costs.
Fascinating.
This notion, I was literally just gonna get into it, about objectives and key results. So for our listeners, John Doerr worked at Intel in the 70s and his boss at the time, whose name escapes me, came with the methodology of objectives and key results. I've been a huge proponent of this notion of objectives and key results and my question for you was, when you're talking about KPIs, KPIs are really, you know, go back to this idea before you said, you know, those initiatives, those come at the bottom and initiatives is also some nomenclature from OKRs. The idea for everyone who may not have heard this is that objectives and key results takes a whole year and breaks it into quarterly results.
And the notion, the idea behind that really is, is that you can set a KPI to say, I want to achieve, you know, eighty five percent customer satisfaction, right? And, and that's the annual goal. And then people don't do anything with it until it's November. Right.
But the objective of the key results takes that and breaks it into quarterly chunks. And the key result aspect of it is, okay, well, I said here's what I want to be able to do, and the key results are how we're gonna get there, and the initiatives are how we tackle this on a weekly basis. Do you look at the KPIs when you're consulting with legal departments, the KPIs as being those initiatives at the bottom of the OKR rung?
The KPIs, sometimes I use this metaphor of driving. Let's say you drive a car and you have a dashboard. Your OKR is the map that you have a destination you need to go there. And let's say you're going to either a field trip or you're transporting a large cargo to another location.
Right? The OKR is telling you this is the location, this is what you need to get to. The KPI is your speed, and we have another concept, KRI, key result indicator, which is basically it's like KPI buzz looking at the past. That can be your MPG, mile per gallon.
Right? And the reason between the difference between the speed and mile per gallon is speed is executive function that is under your control. You control it to get to your destination based on your OKR. Because OKR is telling you that you need to get to the destination within the, let's say, two, three hours.
So if you go too slow, you're not gonna get there. You're gonna be safe. And if you go too fast, you're not gonna be safe. So the speed is the KPI.
And, of course, in the organization, you have so many KPIs. Right? But that's the KPI. Some people, they mix it with o the KRI, which is basically an MPG.
You don't check your MPG every minute. Right? At the end of your trip, if you're transporting a cargo and your driving behavior is not good, your MPG is gonna be high, and then your boss is gonna say, how do you drive and all that stuff. Right?
Still important. So the way that I explain is KPI is for the executive c level, and the KRI is for the board. They look at your performance in the past. Right?
And OKR is the goal, as you mentioned, yearly, sometimes, like, quarterly, is the objective that this is what we're gonna accomplish. Now the art is to define certain KPI, and we don't have more than five normally, that they contribute to your OKR effectively.
And that those are the one that is a kinda like the team needs to sit down and figure out what are the activity that has maximum impact towards your OKR. Like, for instance, one KPI can be AC of your car. Right? And the AC can go up and down.
But how much it contributes to your destination? Of course, if it's too hot, that's gonna be not comfortable. But still, we can't drive. Right?
I use this metaphor because there are so many things that in the legal department or the department can be mapped to this basic metaphor.
Yeah. You know what's interesting is a lot of this is about continuous improvement. So for example, you could say, well, the AC is not really that impactful for the duration in which I drive. But one one might say, yeah, but your MPG is gonna go down because you burn energy that's cooling the car.
So when we think about, like, the theory of triple constraints, you're like, oh, what? And it's, like, essentially cost effort duration. Yeah. And there's another one that's quality, about quality.
So when you think about, like, how do you want to get to a destination, you gotta think about cost effort duration and quality. And it's really the way that you explain it is kind of so in line with, like, how I think about the vision of VMG. Mhmm. Because you can't really change anything that you don't measure.
You can qualitatively say, I'd like to have, you know, a great trip to Cleveland, but quantitatively, in order to get to Cleveland, you need to figure out, well, what kind of car do I take? Maybe I'll take a plane. How fast should I go? When will I arrive?
There's all these logistical quantitative elements. There's a set it, forget it mentality and legal metrics frameworks, which is like once we have it, everything's cool. But it's like, no, like you said, have a graveyard. Like, cast away those metrics that aren't serving any real intelligence and value.
I think that we are in an AI moment. Dan and I talk about this, and I'd love to get your thought about this. So we're in this moment where we have key to insight accelerators through AI tools, lots of them. And speed to insight is going to be so much different now that we have all these great tools at our disposal.
But what happens to the teams that don't adopt these technologies or don't want to adopt these technologies? Now there might be good reason. Worried about maybe defensibility or they're worried about, you know, is this quality or but there might also be competitive reasons. So there's this idea about how do we use these new tools to compete versus comply.
So when you think about running metrics inside a law department, and I know that you're writing a book for law firms as well, how do you balance the business indicators to say, this is a competitive indicator, this is a compliance indicator? And tell me what your thinking is.
Are they equal but different, or are they kind of all to be looked at in the same context?
That's a good question. I think I hate to say this, but this depends to the organization and whether what is their mission at the moment. Right? If they are focusing on, let's say, growth and, like, at this point, their competitiveness is more important.
But I think that at the same time, it has to be a balance between them. But one thing I can tell you about the doing the decision between this, a lot of time I see that organization, they don't do measurement. It's just because they trust too much on their intuitions and gut feeling. And they think that if they are in the industry long enough and they have seen it enough, they don't need numbers that much.
And it can be done based on evidence and things that you see on the table quickly. But one of the thing I always say, we are using measure and metrics every day in our life, right? If somebody's getting these, like, glucose meters are getting very popular, right? And that's something that we it's so important and they just wanted to understand their body, right?
And then they measure it, they they control it and they study about it, right? And the same thing with the they go to gym and they measure everything. Right? But then when they go to the office and they deal with a big organization, millions of dollars at stake and risk, they just go with the gut feeling.
And that's something that it requires change the culture and perspective, but also it requires thinking from the top. And then one of the thing I wanna just add to this is the transformation of, let's say, general counsel to CLO, getting legal department transformed to the business unit. That means that the CLO become part of the club of other c levels as far as the business, and the language of the business is numbers and KPIs.
So if they wanted to speak in that language, storytelling using number, then they come back to their department and say, we need to have this done, like other department they are doing. If you look at hundred years ago, right, finance, CFO didn't exist. It was accounting.
And then the finance become a key role partner of the c level because now finance come in and is strategically planned for the future, not just looking at the book and say, you're over or under budget. Right? And the same thing with IT. IT used to be support of technology, but the CIO now and CTO, they are a strategic planner of the future of the company using AI and things like that. And the same thing is with the CLO, and I think that the CLO, they need numbers and measurement and KPIs like any everybody else.
Have you seen well intentioned KPI programs fall short? And if so, what lessons should legal operation leaders learn from those failures?
Actually, I did a presentation at CLOC, twelve mistakes of implementing KPIs and myth, and I would be happy to share that with you. But top ones, I would say, not aligning metrics with the mission vision and all that. And the other one is measuring everything and everything that you have, like creating noise for the management and missing the important.
I would say the other one is just treating the KPI program as a one time project. A lot of time, we define a project and say, hey. We just need to create a dashboards and metrics and all that, and they just IT or whoever, they did a jambal k away. Not knowing that two months later, the requirement changed.
You need a new set of KPIs. You need a set of measurements. And then people are stuck with a dashboard that they look at like a gallery. They don't use it, and I call it, and sometimes it's like that little yogurt in the fridge, nobody touch it and it's there and I normally say, hey stop delivering that report and see who scream.
And sometimes two months later nobody complain because nobody uses those reports.
Mori Kabiri, well, I'm sure we could talk for at least another hour on this. For those who have not picked up a copy of the book, Legal Operation KPIs, I highly recommend that you do so. I think Eric and I have learned a tremendous amount from you in the last thirty minutes, and we're so grateful for your time. Thank you so much for being here with us.
Thank you so much. I learned a lot. Thank you. Thanks for joining us on BDO's Legal Tech Talk podcast.
If you're enjoying these podcasts, don't forget to rate, review, and subscribe for more episodes. Head over to www.bdo.com for a list of all of our episodes, transcripts, resources, and how to get in touch with us to continue the conversation.
Until next time, this has been another episode of BDO's Legal Tech Talk.
Daniel Gold is an attorney and a Principal at BDO USA, where he leads eDiscovery managed services. He hosts BDO's Legal Tech Talk, co-hosts the NeLI Pod and founded Gold Standard Leadership.
More about DanielGet the next one in your inbox
Daniel Gold writes weekly on leadership, legal technology and eDiscovery.
Subscribe on Substack