TL;DR: Resilience is not about how much pressure you can absorb. It is about learning to distinguish between a signal that says “this is hard and you are growing” and one that says “something is structurally wrong.” Your body has always known that difference. The question is whether you have been listening.
Why Do Leaders Keep Ignoring the Most Accurate Data They Have?
Today’s episode is going to start a little differently from what I initially planned because of what happened to me this morning.
Today is Sunday, and when I awoke, I was greeted by a gorgeous Sunday morning. My WHOOP confirmed what I knew: I slept incredibly well, with a recovery score of 93 percent and a sleep score of 79 percent. I was ready for my Sunday long-distance run. I got out of bed, excited to hit the pavement, fueled up with some carbs and hydrated with electrolytes and creatine. I had my route mapped. My mind was locked in. That was until I started to put on my socks. That’s when my lower back sent a signal that stopped the whole plan. It was as if club music were playing and you were feeling the groove when the record came to a screeching halt.
The pain hurt so badly that I literally fell to the ground. My body sent me a signal that it had made up its mind, but my mind had not yet caught up. So there I was, lying on my back with an ice pack and some pain medicine. And against every instinct to keep trying to run, my body would win out over my mind. The body just said, “Not today.”
I had done everything right: the preparation, intention, and commitment were genuine. Yet my body overruled it all in seconds, without negotiation or deliberation.
My mind immediately started negotiating. I am already dressed. I fueled up. It is a beautiful morning. I said I was going to do this. I have a training schedule.
Sound familiar? Because you are running that exact negotiation right now. Not about a Sunday run. About a client you should not have taken on. A commitment you made three months ago that every physical signal in your body has been flagging for six weeks. A conversation you know you need to have keeps getting pushed to next week.
The preparation is real. The intention is real. The professional identity says go. And the body already knows the answer.
What Has the Resilience Conversation Been Missing?
Over the past year on this show, the resilience conversation has largely focused on what you build within yourself, such as the morning routine and calendar discipline. The practices that hold when the environment is not cooperating. Episode 9: Sometimes you have to go slower to get faster. Episode 51: what holds when everything bends. The throughline has been developing the personal fortitude to stay in the game. That is real work, and I stand behind every word of it.
However, two weeks ago, I spent several days listening to five world-class leadership speakers. One of them was a physician named Dr. Neha Sangwan, and what she said really resonated with me: “If your mind and your body disagree, the body wins; every time.”
Then she said something more specific. The signals your body sends, the tightness in your shoulders, the weight in your chest, the specific quality of exhaustion that feels different from ordinary tiredness, those are not noise. They are data. Accurate, protective, early-warning data that the professional identity has been trained to override.
Here is what I think most leaders have gotten wrong, including me at various points in my own career: we have confused toughness with ignoring the signal, discipline with override, and along the way, we have called it resilience when it was really suppression. Those two things look identical from the outside, but they do not.
What Is the Difference Between Toughness and Suppression?
I have run long enough to know that my body sends different kinds of signals on a run. There is the signal at mile ten. Going up a steep hill, my legs feel heavy, and this is hard. I don’t stop for that one. That signal is accurate: it is hard, and you are growing. You read it correctly as productive discomfort, and you keep moving.
There is a completely different signal, the one that says something is structurally wrong. A stress fracture does not feel like tired legs, and, as with this morning, a pulled back does not feel like general fatigue. The quality, specificity, and location are different.
The leaders I have watched burn out over twenty years in professional services missed the signal because they had been so thoroughly trained to treat all bodily signals as noise that they had lost the ability to distinguish among them. Every signal became a distraction from the work and just something else to push through.
Dr. Sangwan puts a clinical frame around this. She describes three phases: the alarm phase, the adaptation phase, and the exhaustion phase. Most professionals are already in some stage of adaptation by the time anyone around them notices something is wrong. The alarm phase, when the body sends the clearest signals, has already passed, and they overrode it by calling it a rough week, a demanding client, or just part of the job. But the reality was that it was data, and they just did not read it.
If you are planning summer 2027 travel, I have something worth your time. In July of 2027, I will be on an AmaWaterways river cruise sailing the Rhine from Amsterdam to Basel. Seven nights. Rhine Castles. Swiss Alps. Brodie, my wife and luxury travel designer at M. Markham Travel, has secured exclusive preferred rates on this specific sailing just for GSL readers and listeners. Come find me on the deck. Bring whatever you are working through. We will talk.
See the full itinerary and lock in your rate at mmarkhamtravel.com/GSL
What Are the Six Conditions That Force Leaders to Override the Signal?
Dr. Sangwan’s clinical work builds on forty years of research by Christina Maslach and Michael Leiter into the structural causes of burnout. What they found is that burnout is really an environmental design problem. There are six specific conditions that produce it, regardless of how resilient the individual is.
The first is workload without resources. You are being asked to execute at a velocity that the available tools, headcount, and clarity cannot support. That is not a personal capacity issue. That is a math problem, and no amount of personal discipline solves it.
The second is a lack of autonomy. The firm hired you for your judgment and then dictated your calendar. That tension, between the expectation of professional expertise and the reality of operational control, produces a specific kind of depletion. It is the depletion of someone who knows what needs to happen and is being prevented from doing it. No meditation app touches that.
The third is absent recognition. I talked about the arrival fallacy in Episode 23, the tendency to fixate entirely on peak moments like a closed deal or a promotion. At the same time, the daily progress that constitutes most of a career goes unacknowledged. When recognition only flows toward peaks, people start running a quiet calculation: is the daily work worth it if nobody sees it?
The fourth is weak relationships. When culture over-indexes on individual metrics, colleagues become competitors. The psychological safety required for someone to say “I made a mistake” or “I need help” disappears. And when that disappears, so does the honest signal. People stop reporting what is happening because disclosure carries a cost.
The fifth is perceived unfairness. When the gap between what the organization says it values and how it allocates compensation and makes decisions becomes visible, trust erodes. It does not erode loudly. It erodes, in the daily calculation, your best people’s sense of whether this place deserves their discretionary energy.
The sixth is disconnection from purpose. When the daily work feels entirely decoupled from something that matters, you are asking people to perform an institutional identity that conflicts with who they are. That conflict, the distance between who the environment requires you to be and who you are, is the most expensive thing in modern leadership. I made that argument in Episode 67. These six drivers are the structural machinery that produces it.
Here is what strong quarterly revenue does to this picture: it acts as camouflage. It hides all six of these conditions so well that leadership teams look at the numbers and conclude everything is fine until the departure email arrives, until the partner meeting where someone finally says what everyone has been thinking for eighteen months. The numbers were telling one story. The bodies in the room were telling another.
What Does This Mean for How You Lead the People Around You?
The resilience conversation in this show has been missing something. Resilience is not just something you build in yourself. As your leadership matures, your primary resilience job changes. It stops being about how much pressure you can personally absorb. It starts with engineering an environment where your people are not asked to override their own signals to prove their loyalty.
The partner who came back from vacation more exhausted than when they left is not failing at rest. They are accurately reporting that one of those six conditions is present in their environment. The associate who said yes to one more matter, even when every signal said no, is not failing at boundaries. They are operating in a system that penalizes the honest signal.
Your job is not to coach those people to manage their energy better. Your job is to look at the six conditions and ask which ones you are creating.
That requires a different kind of listening than most leaders practice. Dr. Sangwan describes five levels. Most of us operate at level three. We are listening for the data: scope, timeline, deliverable. Heart listening, level four, is listening for what the person is experiencing. The gap between those two levels is where your team’s honest signal lives, and most leaders operate below it without realizing it.
What Is Your Body Telling You That You Have Been Trained to Ignore?
I want to close this week by coming full circle to where we started: me lying on my back with ice on it, hoping that I could still head out for my long-distance run. The body winning this morning was a clear leadership decision. I say that because it was obvious once I stopped negotiating with myself.
Your body has been sending you signals about your work, your relationships, your commitments, and your environment for longer than you have been willing to admit. The exhaustion that does not resolve after a good night’s sleep. The specific weight you feel on Sunday evenings is different from ordinary tiredness. The feeling in your chest when a certain client’s name appears on your phone.
Those are data signals, and the most disciplined thing you do this week might not be showing up. It might be reading the signal accurately for the first time in a long time.
I have been working on a book this past year. At the center of it is the argument that the leaders worth following refused to perform a smaller version of themselves, including refusing to perform invulnerability when the body was already keeping a more accurate score. But more on that soon.
Key Takeaways: What Your Body Knows That Your Professional Identity Won’t Admit
There are two kinds of signals your body sends under pressure: productive discomfort, which means you are growing, and structural warnings, which mean something is structurally wrong. The discipline of resilience is learning to tell them apart.
Burnout is an environmental design problem before it is a personal capacity problem. The six drivers Maslach and Leiter identified are structural conditions. Personal resilience practices cannot compensate for a broken environment indefinitely.
As your leadership matures, your primary resilience job shifts from building personal fortitude to engineering conditions in which your people are not forced to override their own signals.
Listening at level three extracts data. Listening at level four hears experience. The gap between those two levels is where your team’s honest signal lives.
The most disciplined thing you do today might be stopping. Reading the signal accurately and acting on it is the highest form of the discipline of resilience.
BACK-CATALOG CONNECTIONS:
